United States v. Rendon’s Empirical Analysis
607 F.3d 982 · 2010
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Relies on Hudson v. Palmer · Nix v. Williams · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Parker v. Levy · Almeida-Sanchez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[M]ilitary law 'is a jurisprudence which exists separate and apart from the law which governs in our federal judicial establishment.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[T]he Fourth Amendment protects members of the armed services from unreasonable searches and seizures”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“different standards than those that apply in the civilian context.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.