607 F. Supp. 875 - Johnson v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Califano v. Yamasaki · Heckler v. Ringer · 561 F. Supp. 656 - Keene Corp. v. International Fidelity Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any individual, after any final decision of the Secretary made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Secretary may allow.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McDonald v. Heckler“[t]here is no statutory provision concerning the consideration of the combined effects of a number of different impairments.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Johnson v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.