607 F. Supp. 911 - Hammerman v. Peacock’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2013
10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78B (§ 2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Cort v. Ash · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.