607 F. Supp. 2d 216 - Roane v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3597 (§ 60002 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 21 U.S.C. § 822 (§ 302 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Heckler v. Chaney · O'Connor v. Donaldson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n agency's statement of a general enforcement policy may be reviewable for legal sufficiency where the agency has expressed the policy ... in some form of universal policy statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“are abstracted from the particular combinations of facts the agency would encounter in individual enforcement proceedings” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.