607 F. Supp. 2d 61 - Schaefer v. Geren’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 803 · 10 U.S.C. § 832 · 10 U.S.C. § 834 · 10 U.S.C. § 883 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · Greene v. Dalton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and contrary to law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Damus v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.