Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 N.W.2d 468 - Vangsness v. Vangsness

Vangsness v. Vangsness’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thiele v. Stich · Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula · Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow · Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer Press · Lamb v. Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That the record might support findings other than those made by the [district] court does not show that the [district] court's findings are defective.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “current law leaves scant if any room for an appellate court to question the [district] court's balancing of best-interests considerations”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.