Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 P2D 261 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2022 · most notably Smith v. Murray (1986), State v. Wood (1982)

22 state decisions

14019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Furman v. Georgia · Trop v. Dulles · Gardner v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]evertheless, as this is a capital case, we considered the defendant's contention on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the defendant’s evidence, although in material conflict with the State’s proof, be such that the jury may entertain a reasonable doubt as to whether or not he acted in self-defense, he is entitled to have the jury instructed fully and clearly on the law of self-defense. Conversely, if all reasonable men must conclude that the evidence is so slight as to be incapable of raising a reasonable doubt in the jury’s mind as to whether a defendant accused of a crime acted in self-defense, tendered instructions thereon are properly refused. [ 457 P.2d at 620 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “scrupulous care must be exercised by the state in capital cases in both the guilt-determining and penalty phases in presentation of evidence and argument because of the acknowledged uniqueness of the death penalty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.