Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 P2D 289 - Jenkins v. Finlinson

Jenkins v. Finlinson’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2024

7 state decisions

3019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Sego v. Kirkpatrick · Baird v. State · Jenkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) there must be a justiciable controversy; (2) the interests of the parties must be adverse; (3) the parties seeking relief must have a legally protectible interest in the controversy; and (4) the issues between the parties must be ripe for judicial determination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.