White v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2007
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Atnip v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 145 - Mott v. State · Schneider v. State · Collins v. State · Gray v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rebuttal testimony is permitted when it is offered to explain, repel, counteract, disprove, or destroy facts given in evidence by an adverse party, as well as to clarify a disputed point, notwithstanding that the same testimony might have been introduced in chief.... White v. State, 607 P.2d 713, 715 (Okl.Cr.1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thornton v. State“Insufficiency of preparation time falls within the parameters of sound judicial discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trevino v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.