Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 1097 - Hewlett v. State

607 So. 2d 1097 - Hewlett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 691 So. 2d 948 - Herring v. State (1997), 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State (1996)

48 state decisions

2501992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · McFee v. State · 557 So. 2d 542 - Griffin v. State · 585 So. 2d 660 - Willie v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every person convicted in this state of a felony who shall have been convicted twice previously of any felony or federal crime upon charges separately brought and arising out of separate incidents at different times and who shall have been sentenced to separate terms of one (1) year or more in any state and/or federal penal institution, whether in this state or elsewhere, shall be sentenced to the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed for such felony, and such sentence shall not be reduced or suspended nor shall such person be eligible for parole or probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[p]hotographs may nevertheless be admitted into evidence in criminal cases where they have probative value and where they are not so gruesome or used in such a way as to be overly prejudicial or inflammatory.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]hen a trial judge imposes a sentence within the prescribed limits of a statute, it will generally be upheld and not regarded as cruel and unusual. Barnwell v. State, 567 So.2d 215, 222 (Miss. 1990); Whitley v. State, 511 So.2d 929, 932 (Miss. 1987). Extended proportionality analysis is not required by the Eighth Amendment for a sentence unless it's a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole or a sentence which is manifestly disproportionate to the crime committed. Barnwell, 567 So.2d at 221 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.