607 So. 2d 1265 - Smith v. Colonial Bank’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"2. Plaintiff has failed to prove that she was exposed by her employment to the risk causing her asthma in a measurably greater degree and in a substantially different manner than are persons in the same employment generally. "3. Other than being `probably allergic to something at work that was making her wheeze,' ... Plaintiff failed to prove that her asthma was caused by a hazard recognized as peculiar to her occupation as a direct result of an exposure, over a period of time, to the normal working conditions of the occupation."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 671 So. 2d 677 - Clark v. Russell Corp.

2. “[I]n order for a disease to be occupational, it must derive from hazards which are (1) in excess of those ordinarily incident to employment in general, and (2) different in character from those found in the general run of occupations.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 671 So. 2d 677 - Clark v. Russell Corp.

3. “[a] disease arising out of and in the course of employment ... which is due to hazards in excess of those ordinarily incident to employment in general and is peculiar to the occupation in which the employee is engaged.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 671 So. 2d 677 - Clark v. Russell Corp.