607 So. 2d 1290 - Vincent v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2014
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Franks v. Delaware · Roviaro v. United States · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`tends to suggest that he either acquiesced in the delays or suffered only minimal prejudice prior to that date. Stevens v. State , 418 So.2d 212 , 214 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982). Lewis v. State , 469 So.2d [1291 ,] 1294 [(Ala.Crim.App. 1984)].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`[T]he congested trial docket was a neutral reason for the delay and should not weigh heavily against the State,' . . . especially in view of the fact that the appellant did not raise a complaint during that time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(C. 55-56.) Our review of the record reveals no assertion of the right to a speedy trial in White's demand for a preliminary hearing. Thus, the trial court's conclusion that White did not assert his right to a speedy trial until July 6, 2005, is supported by the record. That White waited until that time”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.