Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1994
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Ex Parte Frith · Satterwhite v. State · 581 So. 2d 495 - Ross v. State · 381 So. 2d 668 - Smoot v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The objection, 'I object,' 'is not sufficient to place the trial court in error for overruling the objection.' Smoot v. State , 381 So.2d 668 , 671 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The statement of specific grounds of objection waives all grounds not specified, and the trial court will not be put in error on grounds not assigned at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.