Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 184 - Reeves Cedarhurst Dev. v. FIRST AMFED

607 So. 2d 184 - Reeves Cedarhurst Dev. v. FIRST AMFED’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Beazer East, Inc. v. Mead Corp. (1994), 669 So. 2d 98 - Southern Medical Health Systems, Inc. v. Vaughn (1995)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

140199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 870 - West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of Florida · 538 So. 2d 794 - Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY. · Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc. · 531 So. 2d 860 - Bussey v. John Deere Co. · 496 So. 2d 756 - Wilson v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “instrument is unambiguous if only one reasonable meaning clearly emerges.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the circumstances surrounding the contract are considered only where the terms [of the contract] are ambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.