Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 325 - Pettway v. State

607 So. 2d 325 - Pettway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cage v. Louisiana · Wagner v. United States Bankruptcy Court · Edmonds v. Virginia · Swindler v. · Ex Parte Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Rule 16 does not exist in a vacuum; it is subject to the general principle that objections must be made in a timely fashion.... "A trial court should be informed of a party's failure to comply with discovery procedures as soon as the aggrieved party is aware of the non-compliance. At a minimum, the aggrieved party must object to the undisclosed evidence at the time that evidence is offered and must state the specific grounds for the objection, i.e., that the offending party failed to comply with the discovery order or some other aspect of Rule 16. "”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[I]f at any time during the course of proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule . . ., the court . . . may grant a continuance if requested by the aggrieved party; may prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed; *Page 527 or may enter such other order as the court deems just under the circumstances."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Rule 16 does not exist in a vacuum; it is subject to the general principle that objections must be made in a timely fashion....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.