Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 404 - Preston v. State

607 So. 2d 404 - Preston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 718 So. 2d 159 - Hawk v. State (1998), 680 So. 2d 413 - Bonifay v. State (1996)

1 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

370199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Proffitt v. Florida · Spaziano v. Florida · Bullington v. Missouri · Gregory v. Frontier Materials, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]ear and emotional strain may be considered as contributing to the heinous nature of the murder, even where the victim's death was almost instantaneous.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “forced the victim to drive to a remote location, made her walk at knifepoint through a dark field, forced her to disrobe, and then inflicted a wound certain to be fatal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the State must show that the sole or dominant motive for the murder[s] was the elimination of ... witness[es].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.