Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

607 So. 2d 549

Beecher v. Keel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 20, 1992

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1992-11-20

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1999

5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“for the purpose of developing any highway safety improvement project,”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Beecher v. Keel, 627 So. 2d 170 - Wiedeman v. Dixie Elec. Membership Corp.

Applies 23 U.S.C. § 152 · 23 U.S.C. § 409

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-11-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1In re Transportation & Dev., Dept, of;— Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court, Div. “A”, No. 88-24049; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 92CW-2007.

¶2Writ granted. The ruling of the trial court, that the Department of Transportation and Development’s accident data for Airline Highway is admissible, is set aside. The trial court must address the admissibility of each item of evidence as it is offered, in accordance with the criteria of 23 U.S.C. Section 409. If the trial court finds that the data were compiled pursuant to 23 U.S.C. Section 152, “or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds,” they shall not be admitted into evidence. 23 U.S.C. Section 409 (1991). Because the data have already been produced, we do not address the issue of whether the 1991 amendments to Section 409 should be applied retroactively.

/607/so2d/549 · .json · Public domain