607 So. 2d 587 - Thibaut v. Thibaut’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc. (2010), Computer Management Assistance Co. v. Robert F. DeCastro, Inc. (2000)
2 federal appellate · 35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. · 495 So. 2d 1298 - McLean v. Hunter · 359 So. 2d 607 - Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. · Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center, Division of Hospitals · 388 So. 2d 707 - Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.. .the actions and maneuvers undertaken by the defendants in their plans to take over the business of the partnership in their own names to the exclusion of the plaintiff partners caused the demise of the partnership. The defendants essentially obtained an already established, reputable, business enterprise while incurring costs imply to purchase the necessary equipment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Partners have a duty to deal fairly and honestly with each other. Each partner must refrain from taking any advantage of other partners by the slightest misrepresentation or concealment of material facts. Full and complete disclosure of all important information is required despite the fact that the relations between the parties have become strained or in conflict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"The defendant partners' actions combined and contributed to cause the same item of damages; therefore, they are now obligated to reimburse the partnership and/or the plaintiff partners for the losses sustained as a result of their combined actions."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.