Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 641 - State v. Deal

607 So. 2d 641 - State v. Deal’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roviaro v. United States · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm · Alexander v. Virginia · State v. Dotson · 408 So. 2d 1255 - State v. Dewey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears that a defendant or the state is prejudiced by a joinder of offenses in an indictment or bill of information or by such joinder for trial together, the court may order separate trials, grant a severance of offenses, or provide whatever other relief justice requires.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is this court's belief that the State was actually seeking a severance by proceeding to trial on only one count.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.