Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 665 - State v. Anseman

607 So. 2d 665 - State v. Anseman’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2015

18 state decisions

90199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos · 448 So. 2d 676 - State v. Captville · State v. Richardson · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall be given a genuine construction, according to the fair import of their words, taken in their usual sense, in connection with the context, and with reference to the purpose of the provision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The defendant may withdraw a plea of "not guilty" and enter a plea of "not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity," within ten days after arraignment. Thereafter, the court may, for good cause shown, allow such a change of plea at any time before the commencement of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “tailored to both the offender and the offense, is not grossly out of proportion to the severity of the offense and does not constitute needless and purposeless imposition of pain and suffering.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.