607 So. 2d 733 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Comfort v. California · 559 So. 2d 1321 - State v. Wille · 584 So. 2d 318 - State v. Moran · 441 So. 2d 403 - State v. Peters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Factors to be considered by the reviewing court include the importance of the witness' testimony in the prosecution's case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness or material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) Prior statement by witness. The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is: * * * * * * (d) Consistent with the declarant's testimony and is one of initial complaint of sexually assaultive behavior.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.