607 So. 2d 853 - Davis v. Burlingame’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 294 So. 2d 803 - Spillers v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, INC. · 358 So. 2d 926 - Chappuis v. Sears Roebuck & Co. · Vicknair v. Hibernia Bldg. Corp. · 199 So. 2d 210 - Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing Corporation · Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Clemmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if he knew or should have known that the product sold was defective, and failed to declare it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.