State v. Perow’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · State v. Pitcher · State v. Lighten · 400 So. 2d 1363 - State v. Tilley · 598 So. 2d 454 - State v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“4. When departing from the designated sentence range, the court shall: a. Pronounce a sentence which is proportional to the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history; and b. State for the record the reasons for the departure which shall specify the mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the factual basis therefor. 5. Reasons for departure from the designated sentence range are appropriate only when such reasons are based on mitigating or aggravating circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“proportional to the seriousness of the offense and the offender's criminal history.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the offense was a major economic offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bostic
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.