Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 So. 2d 904 - State v. Dailey

607 So. 2d 904 - State v. Dailey’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2015

21 state decisions

170199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 354 So. 2d 1332 - State v. Schwartz · 440 So. 2d 129 - State v. Benoit · 549 So. 2d 351 - State v. Kotwitz · 381 So. 2d 485 - State v. Jackson · 347 So. 2d 172 - State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a ruling on a motion to suppress a confession or statement is adverse to the defendant, the state shall be required, prior to presenting the confession or statement to the jury, to introduce evidence concerning the circumstances surrounding the making of a confession or statement for the purpose of enabling the jury to determine the weight to be given the confession or statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In Louisiana the statutorily mandated test for voluntariness is not whether a confession was induced by improper external forces but whether the confession was free and voluntary and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducements, or promises. La. R.S. 15:451.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.