Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 SO2D 967 - State v. Ragas

State v. Ragas’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2018

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

60199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Sanders · 506 So. 2d 1197 - State v. LeBlanc · 542 So. 2d 23 - State v. Junior · 513 So. 2d 1159 - State v. Schenck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Molestation of a juvenile is the commission by anyone over the age of seventeen of any lewd or lascivious act upon the person or in the presence of any child under the age of seventeen, where there is an age difference of greater than two years between the two persons, with the intention of arousing or gratifying the sexual desires of either person, by the use of force, violence, duress, menace, psychological intimidation, threat of great bodily harm, or by the use of influence by virtue of a position of control or supervision over the juvenile. Lack of knowledge of the juvenile's age shall not be a defense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “he (defendant) look [ sic ] after you and Rolanda when you were playing sometimes?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “...the defendant pulled the victim on top of him while lying in bed, hugged and kissed her and touched her breasts and buttocks. We conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found that the defendant's behavior justified a finding of a lewd and lascivious act. 607 So.2d at 972 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.