Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 607 SW2D 444 - Brucker v. Brucker

Brucker v. Brucker’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2009

10 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nelson v. Nelson · Carrow Ex Rel. Simms v. Carrow · Cascio v. Cascio · Hogsett v. Hogsett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““from time to time after considering all relevant factors including the financial resources of both parties may order a party to pay a reasonable amount for the cost to the other party of maintaining or defending any proceeding under [the Dissolution of Marriage statutes] and for attorney’s fees, including sums for legal services rendered and costs incurred prior to the commencement of the proceeding or after entry of judgment.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The non-appealing party may not know that the appellant plans to appeal until the notice of appeal is filed. In a court-tried case, a motion for new trial is not required. Rule 73.01 (l)(c). An appealing party can wait until judgment becomes final and then, within ten days, file a notice of appeal. Rule 81.04(a). In this situation, the non-appealing party would not realize until after the judgment had become final diat attorney’s fees for appeal would be necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.