Ex Parte Yarborough’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2015
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Ainsworth v. State · Adams v. State · Ex Parte Hagans · Cruz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Prior to 1958, an unvacated judgment of insanity established a presumption of continuing insanity, thus shifting the burden of proof to the State to establish the sanity of the accused by a preponderance of the evidence. Clark v. Beto, 283 F.Supp. 272 (S.C.Tex.1968), affirmed 415 F.2d 71 (1969). See Ex Parte Tuttle [ 445 S.W.2d 194 (Tex.Cr.App.1969) ], supra; Amos v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 44 , 331 S.W.2d 225 (1960); McGee v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 639 , 238 S.W.2d 707 (1950).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Manning v. State · Manning v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.