State v. May’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2016
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · United States v. Jacobsen · Abel v. United States · Arkansas v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“passenger who lets a package drop to the floor of the taxicab in which he is riding can hardly be said to have `abandoned' it”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kealey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.