Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center of Berkley, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.2d 1114 · 1979
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Coastal States Marketing, Inc. v. Hunt (1983), Doherty v. Southern College of Optometry (1988)
17 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 334 (§ 304 of the All Kids Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 361 (§ 601 of the All Kids Act)
Relies on Bishop v. Wood · Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · Continental Inc v. Gte Sylvania Incorporated · United States v. Colgate & Co. · Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is not the sole method, certainly not the sole ground, for equitable intervention....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When indulged in, (palming off) is held to be the essence of the wrong”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.