Shrader v. Califano’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.2d 114 · 1979
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 1997
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Laws v. Celebrezze · Arnold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Maxey v. Califano · Jordan v. Califano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unless the [ALJ] has sufficiently explained the weight he has given to obviously probative exhibits to say that his decision is supported by substantial evidence approaches an abdication of the court's 'duty to scrutinize the record as a whole to determine whether the conclusions reached are rational.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the doctor's recalculation of the FEV1 showed a value still qualifying under the interim tables!”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.