Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 F.2d 1349 - United States v. Jensen

United States v. Jensen’s Empirical Analysis

608 F.2d 1349 · 1979

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
7
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Scop (1988), United States v. Hensel (1983)

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 7 state decisions

250197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 3282

Relies on Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Montana v. United States · Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation · Patterson v. United States · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “errors will not require reversal of a conviction absent a showing that defendant was deprived of substantial rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he test to be used is whether [the nonparty] had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues in the prior case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an expert witness cannot state legal conclusions by applying law to the facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.