United States v. Scharf’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.2d 323 · 1978
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently November 1990
14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Greene v. Massey · Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · United States v. Lemon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.