United States v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.3d 331 · 2010
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3612 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Whitley · United States v. Williams · United States v. Easter · United States v. Sawyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under which staff members from the Bureau of Prisons assist inmates in developing plans to meet their financial obligations. See 28 C.F.R. § 545.10 . Inmates who do not participate may lose a number of privileges identified in 28 C.F.R. § 545.11 (d), which include participating in [a certain] prison job training program, furloughs, and outside work details, and having higher commissary spending limits, access to higher-status housing, and access to community-based programs.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.