Hanson v. Dane County’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.3d 335 · 2010
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Illinois v. Gates · Troxel v. Granville · Davis v. Washington · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the results of interrogation without Miranda warnings are admissible in civil cases.”). Kyles also argues that evidence of his no contest plea and conviction should be excluded as irrelevant because, in light of the fact that he has filed a habeas petition in state court, the conviction”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kyles v. Baker“Although “familial relations” are fundamental, the police did not break up the Hanson family; they just asked some questions of the daughters to learn whether a crime had occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.