Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 F.3d 854 - Armstrong v. Geithner

Armstrong v. Geithner’s Empirical Analysis

608 F.3d 854 · 2010

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Hutchins v. District of Columbia · Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration · Belizan Pc v. Hershon · Thomas v. United States Department of Energy · Pippinger v. Rubin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “address an argument raised only cursorily in a footnote,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.