United States v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
608 F.3d 939 · 2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 district · 5 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2332A (§ 60023 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 2332B (§ 702 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2384 · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Ellis v. Washington County · United States v. Jessup · United States v. Hazime · United States v. Portes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] grand jury indictment, by itself, establishes probable cause to believe that a defendant committed the crime with which he is charged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The presumption remains as a factor because it is not simply an evidentiary tool designed for the courts. Instead, the presumption reflects Congress’s substantive judgment that particular classes of offenders should ordinarily be detained prior to trial .... To rebut the presumption, therefore, a defendant should “present all the special features of his case” that take it “outside the congressional paradigm.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties, employment, financial resources, length of residence in the community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance at court proceedings; and (B) whether, at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial, sentencing,- appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under Federal, State, or local law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.