Haase v. Webster’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1305 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)
Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“altogether too phantasmal to warrant discovery of the magnitude which would be necessary to bring such a covert 'policy' to light.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in effect ... [to] accede to all the equitable relief [Haase] could conceivably win by way of injunction....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“advocating or urging ... forcible resistance to any law of the United States, or containing any threat to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon any person in the United States....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Haase v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.