Shango v. Jurich’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Gerstein v. Pugh · Carey v. Piphus · Hewitt v. Helms · Shango v. Jurich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any relevant evidence may be offered by either party, whether or not part of the administrative record of the disciplinary proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shango v. Jurich“made it all the more important that what was known”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shango v. Jurich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.