Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 6A (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]oth this court and the Ninth Circuit have held that, to the extent plaintiff's proximate causation theory rests on proof of a global procurement strategy, this is not a viable legal theory.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Defendants' activities resulted in the U.S. prices directly setting the worldwide price”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.