608 F. Supp. 2d 516 - De Masi v. Schumer’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on McNeil v. United States · Block v. North Dakota Board of University and School Lands North Dakota Board of University and School Lands · Lehman v. Nakshian · Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. · Willingham v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court presented with a motion to dismiss under both Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) must decide the jurisdictional question first because a disposition of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is a decision on the merits, and therefore, an exercise of jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A federal court has subject matter jurisdiction over a cause of action only when it 'has authority to adjudicate the cause' pressed in the complaint.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“lacks the statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.