608 F. Supp. 2d 97 - Miller v. Insulation Contractors, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
23 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the plaintiffs choice of forum; 2) the defendant’s choice of forum; 3) whether the claim arose elsewhere; 4) the convenience of the parties; 5) the convenience of the witnesses, particularly if important witnesses may actually be unavailable to give live trial testimony in one of the districts; and 6) the ease of access to sources of proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Colley v. James“When the events occur in more than one district, a court can consider which jurisdiction has the stronger factual nexus to the claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may be more familiar with the law governing [Ms. Beall's] DCHRA [and D.C. Wage Payment Act] claim[s].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.