Woodruff v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

23 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In determining sanctions or remedies for discovery violations, this court has set forth the following factors to be considered: (1) the reason why the disclosure was not made; (2) the extent of the prejudice to the opposing party; (3) the feasibility of rectifying that prejudice with a continuance; and (4) any other relevant factors.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Scanlon

2. “(1) by clear and convincing evidence that the third party participated in the reverse-Spreigl incident; (2) that the revers e-Spreigl incident is relevant and material to defendant’s case; and (3) that the probative value of the reverse- Spreigl evidence outweighs its potential for unfair prejudice.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Valentine