Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 P2D 1 - Bangs v. State

Bangs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2013

14 state decisions

1001980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wolf · Des Jardins v. State · State v. Millett · Houston v. State · Price v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden to produce some evidence of self-defense is not ... a heavy one; this standard is satisfied when self-defense has fairly been called into issue.... A jury question will be presented and [a self-defense] instruction required if the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the accused, might arguably lead a juror to entertain a reasonable doubt as to the defendant’s guilt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The law of self-defense is designed to afford protection to one who is beset by an aggressor and confronted by a necessity not of his own making.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Thus, in determining whether Brown was a first aggressor, the crucial inquiry is not whether he was armed when he went to meet with Miller; rather, it is whether his assault occurred “in the course of a dispute provoked by the defendant at a time when he [knew] or ought reasonably' to [have known] that the encounter [would] result in mortal combat.” This is an inquiry that must be resolved in light of the totality of the evidence presented at trial. [Citation omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.