Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 P2D 1131 - Phillips v. Williams

Phillips v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Akin v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (1998), McLin v. Trimble (1990)

6 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

1701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Oregon v. Hass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “mandated standards of inmate-parole-release eligibility [and] also those that would structure eligibility for mere consideration of parole release.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no constitutional or inherent right of a convicted person to be conditionally released before the expiration of a valid sentence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “Interests protected by due process are not always 'created by the [Federal] Constitution. Rather, they are [often] created and their dimensions are defined' by some independent source, which consists quite frequently of a state statute or rule entitling the person to certain benefits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.