Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 So. 2d 1016 - Weber v. State

608 So. 2d 1016 - Weber v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1996
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 397 So. 2d 475 - Bazley v. Tortorich · 512 So. 2d 389 - Caudle v. Betts · Dick v. Gravel Logging Co. · 564 So. 2d 814 - Ward v. Tenneco Oil Co. · Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts are to liberally construe the act: The compensation statute, with its amendments, was designed to cover all employees who might reasonably be brought under its paternalistic protection. In [ Dick v. Gravel Logging Company, 152 La. 993 , 95 So. 99 (1922)], the court said that the statute is humane in its purpose and that its scope should be enlarged and its provisions liberally construed so as to include all services that can reasonably be said to be within the said statute. If it is to be liberally construed so as to include all possible persons when they seek its protection, surely it would not do to say that the provisions of the statute should be restricted when persons, in order to recover in tort, are attempting to have themselves excluded from the coverage of the statute. Spanja v. Thibodeaux [Thibodaux] Boiler Works, 2 So.2d 668, 672 (La.App.Orl.1941).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.