Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 SO2D 1187 - Wilbourn v. Hobson

Wilbourn v. Hobson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

31 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Guice v. McGehee · Seven Seas Frozen Products v. Fast Frozen Foods · Simpson County v. Burkett · 465 So. 2d 1050 - Roberts v. Miss. Rep. Party State Exec. Comm. · Ulmer v. Currie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ourts, both trial and appellate, ... are bound by stipulations in respect of matters which may validly be made the subject matter of stipulations. Courts are bound to enforce stipulations which parties may validly make, where they are not unreasonable or against good morals or sound public policy. Ordinarily they have no power to ... go beyond the terms [of such stipulations] ... or to make findings contrary to the terms of a stipulation, or render a judgment not authorized by its terms.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] stipulated fact is one which both parties agree is true,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here the parties file and gain court approval of a formal stipulation agreement . . . the factual issues addressed in the agreement are forever settled and excluded from controversy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.