Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 608 SO2D 1386 - Matthews v. Matthews

Matthews v. Matthews’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2015

6 state decisions

40199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blankenship v. Blankenship · 464 So. 2d 109 - Isham v. Isham · 595 So. 2d 900 - Shelton v. Shelton · 508 So. 2d 276 - Lloyd v. Lloyd · Robbins v. Robbins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “other than for purposes of correcting clerical errors, a trial court lacks jurisdiction to modify a property settlement once thirty days have elapsed from the date of a divorce judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.