State v. Fortune’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably 733 So. 2d 127 - State v. Jones (1999), 938 So. 2d 147 - State v. Caples (2006)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · State v. Jacobs · 385 So. 2d 248 - State v. Byrd · 563 So. 2d 847 - State v. Lubrano · 248 Pa. Super. 318 - Commonwealth v. Mays
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Direct testimony by the victim that he believed the defendant was armed, or circumstantial inferences arising from the victim's immediate surrender of his personal possessions in response to the defendant's threats, may support a conviction for first degree robbery.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Stanley · State v. Cook
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.