Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

608 So. 2d 560

Seabrook v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1992

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1992-11-18

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1996

5 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), DENY EITHER DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER EITHER THE FLORIDA OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; OR VIOLATE THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS AS SET FORTH IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Seabrook v. State, London v. State

Relies on 596 So. 2d 481 - Hodges v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender. We affirm. However, as we did in Hodges v. State, 596 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), DENY EITHER DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER EITHER THE FLORIDA OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; OR VIOLATE THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, AS SET FORTH IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
SMITH, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.
/608/so2d/560 · .json · Public domain