State v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2014
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cherek v. United States · Boyd v. North Carolina · 531 So. 2d 161 - Poore v. State · Woolls v. Texas · Florida Bar v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Florida's Constitution gives a defendant the right to be tried in the county where the crime took place. A wrinkle on the venue rule is provided by section 910.05, Fla. Stat. (1991) for crimes where the acts constituting one offense are committed in two or more counties. Under that provision, trial in any county where any of the criminal acts take place is proper. Tucker v. State, 100 Fla. 1440 , 131 So. 327 (1930). This venue rule has been applied in theft and larceny cases where the thief carries stolen property across county lines... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the vehicle while in that county. In Stephens , the defendant broke into a car in Volusia County and led Volusia County deputy sheriffs on a high-speed chase into Seminole County, where Seminole County deputies captured and arrested him. Id. at 906 n. 2. Stephens argued on appeal that the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mosley v. State“do not address the question of whether burglary can also be proved under this statute by alleging and proving that a defendant not only unlawfully entered a conveyance, but also unlawfully remained there, with the unlawful intent to steal it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mosley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.